“I will lead by example. My Assistant Sheriff and I will receive the same discipline as the officers”
Okay then. Dave Williams was in charge of Internal Affairs when Fred Davis was found to be drunk and driving his police car. Davis fined himself $200.00. Is that the same punichment others would get under your administration? A Circuit Court judge declared Williams and Leonard C. Collins to have acted with malfeanance while in office, which by the way is a criminal offense. What happened to you? You illegally tape recorded an FOP meeting which is a felony, what happened to you? You violated Jon Norris’ rights, what happened to you? You had your subordinate officers put a new roof on your house while they were on duty. Another felony. What happened to you? You were involved in questionable acts with prostitutes. What happened to you? You covered up a criminal investigation of many officers who used the NCIC computers to do checks on citizens without their consent? Another felony. What happened to you? I’ll tell you what happened to you. Nothing. You were allowed to retire with a big pension.
Now you are trying to sell yourself to the good citizens of Charles County as some kind of angel. Does Dave Williams even know what truth means?
YES! the “Sheriff’s Office” is doing a good job NOT one man!
You obviously know nothing about real leadership, and why would you? You’re the one supporting Edith, right? No leader there, either. A real leader leads by example. Sheriff Coffey does just that. That’s why the Sheriff’s Office is doing a good job, BECAUSE of ONE man.
Ooops, you’re out of time…early voting starts today. REX COFFEY FOR SHERIFF!!!!!
LOOKS LIKE THE CITIZENS OF CHARLES COUNTY ARE HAPPY WITH SHERIFF COFFEY.
Below are the results of a Maryland Independent Poll
Is your sheriff’s office doing a good job?
Posted by Bill Jones
YES! the “Sheriff’s Office” is doing a good job NOT one man!
100% TRUE. And since they do such a great job, we should reward them by voting for the man they endorsed. Good point JoanB. VOTE REX COFFEY - FOP ENDORSED. I knew you would eventually come around to logical thinking. You learn something here on the Duck. I’m proud of you.
I still have not heard a response from Dave on the fact that his choice for Assistant Sherrif has lived in King George and not Charles County for the past few years.
I still have not heard a response from Dave on the fact that his choice for Assistant Sherrif has lived in King George and not Charles County for the past few years.
Maryland law is very clear. The Sheriff MUST live in the county for FIVE years before he is Sheriff. So Brian Eley can not serve as second in command ( to serve in this position you must have the same qualifications as the Sheriff ie live in the county) or as Sheriff for five years after he returns to Charles County. So even if he wanted to, he could not run for Sheriff in 2014. He could not be appointed as Sheriff if something were to happen to Williams either.
Another important concern is Eley’s personal financial blunders of the past. Can Charles County afford to have someone in office to handle millions when he can’t handle his own money? Some would suggest that his position in St. Mary’s County would qualify him to handle the budget. In St. Mary’s County, the County handles the Sheriff’s budget, not Brian Eley. Smart move St. Mary’s.
Now Mr. Williams is handing out propaganda with distorted and false campaign information. If you would like the actual facts about what he claims, you can find it here: http://www.rexcoffey.com/lies2.html
Apparently Mr. Williams was asleep when he was supposed to be paying attention in the ethics classes at the FBI Academy. No wonder the rank and file officers endorsed Sheriff Coffey. I wouldn’t want a shyster as my boss either!
This is a responce from Sheriff Coffey on his web site about Mr. Williams tactics: As most everyone is aware, one of my opponents is running a very negative campaign. This includes attacking specific officers and attacking the integrity of the Sheriff’s Office.
This opponent clearly holds resentment towards many members of your Sheriff’s Office and the Fraternal Order of Police for not supporting his bid for election.
I refuse to partake in any negative campaigning. I prefer to talk about the issues and not personalities. However, I refuse to allow anyone to intentionally and maliciously spread inaccurate information about the men and women who serve our county with honor without setting the record straight.
My opponent has belittled the hard work and efforts of our Officers to reduce crime over 21% in 18 months. His accusations include an increase in District Court cases in Charles County as proof that crime is not going down. What that proves is that the closure rates with arrests for the crimes that do occur are higher now than in the past. He continues his attacks on a daily basis and this is unacceptable for a man who is attempting to gain the respect of our officers and the public.
My opponent has said and written the Sheriff’s Office has hired Officers with knowledge of questionable history that would prohibit them from testifying in court. That is NOT FACTUAL. Once again, his false allegations are nothing more than negative political propaganda.
My opponent has publically testified before the Board of County Commissioners to have the budget of the Sheriff’s Office reduced.
The men and women of the Sheriff’s Office have been dedicated public servants and for a candidate for Sheriff to want to take money out of the pockets of already underpaid officers is just plain wrong.
Knowing my opponent all too well, I can guarantee that his attacks are far from over.
I ask that you consider the source and the reputation of deception he has earned during this campaign season
before assuming that what he says is true.
I REFUSE TO USE ANY UNETHICAL OR NEGATIVE TACTICS FOR ANY REASON. ESPECIALLY
TO MISLEAD THE CITIZENS OF CHARLES COUNTY, JUST TO WIN AN ELECTION.
Let’s Keep Moving Forward! I ask for your SUPPORT and VOTE on September 14, 2010
Thank you,
[ Edited: 09 September 2010 10:10 PM by Ten Bears]
Great front page story in todays INDY. Mr. Cooper makes a good point about the politically movtivated rumors. The Duck was forced to retract much of the false information. I would love to see Dave Williams and Sam Graves get together with Mr Coopers attorney and file a law suit for the slander that is being allowed my members of this and other blogs.
Funny thing is, this rumor he went on the radio to debunk that has “buzzed” on local blogs and social gatherings has NOT been on Delusional Duck.
He can feel sorry for us all he wants, and may want those who spread the rumors “brought to justice” but Delusional Duck hasn’t been part of the process. He’s barking up the wrong tree if he was implying we were involved.
has NOT been on Delusional Duck - Let me clarify that. The rumor was posted on the Forums on late at night on August 31 by an anonymous registered user. It was closed by early morning on September 1. It hasn’t been discussed since.
That said, I encourage everyone to avoid this topic on Delusional Duck for the time-being.
Great front page story in todays INDY. Mr. Cooper makes a good point about the politically movtivated rumors. The Duck was forced to retract much of the false information. I would love to see Dave Williams and Sam Graves get together with Mr Coopers attorney and file a law suit for the slander that is being allowed my members of this and other blogs.
JoanB, from my understandings the Supreme Court of the United States of America has already addressed the issue of content providers allowing un-true or slanderous post to be placed on their websites. I don’t have a law degree, nor have I graduated from the F.B.I. Academy, however I do believe the different topics that are discussed on the D.D. are expressed opinions of the respected duck makings said posting, and not the official views of the Head Duck, thus the Supreme Court decision upon this matter would stand and your express opinion to hold the different blogs for slander are mute. I would hope the “Sheriff hopeful”, would understand the laws of our land before he started something that has already been decided and placed in to law. Feelings may be hurt, but if it’s the truth is it really slander or deformation of character?
That said, I encourage everyone to avoid this topic on Delusional Duck for the time-being. Posted by Pauleen Brewer
JoanB, from my understandings the Supreme Court of the United States of America has already addressed the issue of content providers allowing un-true or slanderous post to be placed on their websites. I don’t have a law degree, nor have I graduated from the F.B.I. Academy, however I do believe the different topics that are discussed on the D.D. are expressed opinions of the respected duck makings said posting, and not the official views of the Head Duck, thus the Supreme Court decision upon this matter would stand and your express opinion to hold the different blogs for slander are mute. I would hope the “Sheriff hopeful”, would understand the laws of our land before he started something that has already been decided and placed in to law. Feelings may be hurt, but if it’s the truth is it really slander or deformation of character? Posted by Rocky Raccoon
RR. I wish you could have respected Pauleen’s request. But oh well this is the Duck right? I understand if you don’t have a law degree but maybe you should obtain some legal advise the next time you provide such advise to others. There have been many successful awards that have involved slander and deformation on blogs. In some states it’s covered under the cyber stalking law. And sure there are some exemptions for political barbing but not the allegation that someone has committed a crime. Victims have also brought blog owners into court and for the most part have been successful. The Duck would be one good example when they have posted rules or Terms of Service for a person registering on DD. If a blogger violates such terms and the blog owner fails to take action then they themselves may become party to the slander or deformation and could be named a defendant in a civil or possibly criminal action.
Here are just some of the Terms of Service you have agreed to on the Duck. Caution you may not want to visit an adult web site prior to logging on to the Duck because according to the site they collect and store that information.
“All messages posted at this site express the views of the author, and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the owners and administrators of this site.
By registering at this site you agree not to post any messages that are obscene,
vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, or that violate any laws.
We will permanently ban all users who do so.
We reserve the right to remove, edit, or move any messages for any reason.
For more information please also read our full terms of service and comment policy.”
“Collection of Information by Delusional Duck
When visiting this Web site, DD automatically collects and stores the following information about your visit:
The Internet Protocol address and domain name of your Internet service provider. The Internet Protocol address is a numerical identifier assigned either to your Internet service provider or directly to your computer, which can be used to direct internet traffic to you;
The type of browser and operating system you used;
The date and time you visited this site;
The web pages or services you accessed at this site and the files that you downloaded;
The URL or address of the Web site you visited prior to coming to this Web site and from which any web page on this site was linked.”
JoanB I understand if you don’t have a law degree but maybe you should obtain some legal advise the next time you provide such advise to others. There have been many successful awards that have involved slander and deformation on blogs. In some states it’s covered under the cyber stalking law. And sure there are some exemptions for political barbing but not the allegation that someone has committed a crime. Victims have also brought blog owners into court and for the most part have been successful. The Duck would be one good example when they have posted rules or Terms of Service for a person registering on DD. If a blogger violates such terms and the blog owner fails to take action then they themselves may become party to the slander or deformation and could be named a defendant in a civil or possibly criminal action.
JoanB, you might want to check this out for your own edification:
Operators of newspaper Web sites, blogs and chat rooms that allow readers to post anonymous comments using pseudonyms do not have to readily reveal the posters’ identities in defamation suits, Maryland’s highest court ruled yesterday, further shaping an emerging area of First Amendment law in the Internet age.
I just found this facebook comment on Sheriff Coffey’s facebook page. I think EVERYONE should read it and make sure others are aware of what is going on.
“Today Dave Williams posted a photograph of an empty police car on his facebook. He claims empty police cars don’t protect people, police officers do. This is not only the most self serving post I have ever seen Dave Williams make public, but the most irresponsible. He gives the perception that he is somehow aware of the strategic plan of the Sheriff’s Office. Police presence is one of the most effective ways to PREVENT CRIME. This includes the use of police resources. This is called proactive law enforcement. Dave Williams has always been a proponent of reactive police work. That is dealing with something after it has occured. Placing police cruisers in strategic locations is but one small aspect of the entire plan to combat criminal activity. The fact is that deserving or not, the mall has a perception of being unsafe and at best a location for unruley and disrectful people to hang out. The Sheriff’s Office has combated the issue of criminal behavior and with the exception of shoplifting, the criminal activity at the mall is now a rare occurance. The rudeness and obnoxious behavior of some of the patrons is another issue that is a priority of the mall to address by warning the patrons and if need be, banning them from the mall.
Another person posted a comment about the intelligence of criminals and how they can’t be fooled by one aspect of our strategic plan. Well, the criminals don’t have to be too smart if a man running for the top cop position in Charles County spells it out for them. Way to go Dave Williams. I hope you are proud of yourself. I can only hope an officer or citizen doesn’t get hurt by his making it public the small part of our plan and giving the perception that the cruisers are the whole stategic plan.
Please tell your friends and family about this last ditch effort on Williams’ behalf. He is clearly in it to win it at whatever cost. Even if it means putting you at jeopardy.
Here is a link for those of you who have not seen his post.”
Weren’t you the one who started the whole rumor in the first place? Now drop it and follow the instructions given to you and us by the administrators of this blog. Idiot.
Citizens of Charles County, You are LESS safe this morning thanks to the big mouth of Dave Williams. Law enforcement has been using bait cars for a long time as a tool to deter crime. But it won’t work if someone (DW) tells the criminals when its being used.
This is unbelievable! Anyone (much less someone running for Sheriff) that would spread around information like this obviously does not care about the people of Charles County! I think that using unmanned police vehicles in certain situations is a great idea. Another way that Rex is saving the department money - if it deters someone from speeding or makes a criminal think an officer is close by, without having to actually have an officer in the car - its a great idea! Its a shame that this election has turned into such a nasty one - with unfounded accusations and untruths. I thought politicians were supposed to be adults - yet some feel that they need to stup to this elementary school behavior! Shame on you Dave Williiams! RE-ELECT REX COFFEY!
Dave Williams isn’t the only one who gets phone calls from officers. I just had three seperate officers confirm that when Dave Williams was commander of Patrol, the Agency put unmanned police cars in the Bryans Road area. Dave has his little butterballs posting that this is a waste of taxpayers money, but Dave Williams did the same thing.
FACTS ARE FACTS. DAVE WILLIAMS PUT THE SAFETY OF OUR POLICE AND CITIZENS AT POTENTIAL RISK JUST TO THROW A FINAL PUNCH AT COFFEY. HIS TACTICS ARE AWFUL. ANY OFFICER WHO HAS PROVIDED DAVE WILLIAMS WITH TACTICAL INFORMATION SHOULD BE BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES TOO. I’VE BEEN TOLD THAT HIS PARTNER IN CRIME IS NONE OTHER THAN TIM CRAWFORD.
I just checked crimeports.com and found the only crimes that have occurred at the mall in the last 60 days were thefts. Shop lifting is classified as a theft. No other crimes.
