I like your honesty and ability to admit mistakes and see things from different angles when given new information instead of locking into a view point no matter what. I have worked with him for many years as a cop. The prospect of him being sheriff would absolutly scare the crap out of me. Just my opinion based on my experiences watching him in action.
I like your honesty and ability to admit mistakes and see things from different angles when given new information instead of locking into a view point no matter what. I have worked with him for many years as a cop. The prospect of him being sheriff would absolutly scare the crap out of me. Just my opinion based on my experiences watching him in action.
I understand and respect your opinion Simon. All of the candidates will be put
under a microscope. Then it will be up to the voters to choose. Not saying that
I have much faith in the voters, considering that these are the same ‘brain-dead’
yahoos that put “Dubya’ and the conservatives in charge for 8 years. They looked
the other way and allowed 25 million ‘illegals’ to enter the country. They spent
1 trillion dollars on a stupid ‘so-called’ war in Iraq, while at the same time
letting Ben-Laden slip away into the mountains of Afghanistan. This is a prime
example of what happens when the voters choose the wrong leadership…twice.
Didn’t Davis also serve two terms? I rest my case.
Your absolutely right doc. You would be hard pressed to find a nicer person than crawford but I believe he does not posess the skills necassary to be a good sheriff. But not many do. I also have no faith in the voters, shit, just read some of the people on this blog giving opinions and advice based on pure stupidity. Scary
Simon, Maybe that’s what we need. There are many officers on the agency who shouldn’t be there. They either do nothing or are so aggressive they themselves are breaking the law. I think a fresh dose of leadership is what is needed. Something the current administration has none of.
We are normal humans not superhumans. We have good and bad just like every other profession. The difference is we are constantly expected to be perfect.
Rex coffey is doing a damn good job. I do not believe there is any candidate who could do better. But again. Deputies only work with the sheriff. We work for the citizens. Doesn’t matter who the sheriff is. We will see what happens next election and hopefully we will be better because of it
Then I guess we will have to have Crawford produce those records. The testimony of the Rescue Squad workers who saved his life will tell you just how strong the odor of alcohol was and the fact that the accident was in the early morning hours after a Redskins game where there were many many witnesses that are aware of the amount of alcohol that Crawford consumed that day will be strong evidence of Crawford’s level of alcohol - The records are still out there and my strong suspicion is that Crawford will never let anyone see them - he knows he was drunk and he will never be man enough to admit his mistake.
Why are sure that the blood results will never be produced? That is a very bold statement.
And no I do not have it in for Crawford - just people that are not honest about their mistakes.
Zip It? What is that suppose to be ? If you don’t want to hear the opinions of others you are in the wrong place! MADD will not adhere to your request to “zip it” I can assure you.
Can you post documentation of the testimonies of the Rescue Squad who responded to the accident, and the witnesses who saw Lt. Crawford drinking?
And one personal thing, I truthfully believe that those who talk out of their ass, seem to be more inclined to throw out insults. And to quote you manny,
“...certainly be a MAJOR issue if this idiot continues to run for elected office”
“he knows he was drunk and he will never be man enough to admit his mistake.”
So before trying to further rumors along, why not post some real FACTS AND EVIDENCE, other than word of mouth hearsay.
Why are you using profanity? Crawford knows he was drunk - he had the benefit of that being overlooked at the time of the incident - He will not enjoy the same overlooking now that he has chosen to put himself in the spot light by running for public office -
This drunk driving is not the only issue with Crawford - he also was part of a large failed business venture that proves his inability to be fiscally responsible - NO ONE needs some report to prove that! Bottom Line - Crawford is not a viable candidate for any elected position.
Why are you using profanity? Crawford knows he was drunk - he had the benefit of that being overlooked at the time of the incident - He will not enjoy the same overlooking now that he has chosen to put himself in the spot light by running for public office -
This drunk driving is not the only issue with Crawford - he also was part of a large failed business venture that proves his inability to be fiscally responsible - NO ONE needs some report to prove that! Bottom Line - Crawford is not a viable candidate for any elected position.
First off Manny, ‘damn’ is not a profane word. Secondly, trying to bring an allegation
that Crawford was drinking and driving without proof/documentation is just down-right
idiotic.
Show us something in “black and white” or stop spouting off.
Crawford is a LOSER. People that cannot express themselves without using prfane language show their shallow level of thinking. Then again if you are supporting Crawford that would be another indication that you are incompetent. Enough said - find another candidate ‘cause yours is a LOSER.
Crawford is a LOSER. People that cannot express themselves without using prfane language show their shallow level of thinking. Then again if you are supporting Crawford that would be another indication that you are incompetent. Enough said - find another candidate ‘cause yours is a LOSER.
I support Crawford as a person. The point I’m trying to make is that if there is no
‘real’ proof of Crawford driving drunk, then you need to zip-it Manny. As the old
saying goes…put up or shut up!
As for profanity. The word ‘Damn’ is in the BIBLE as well as the word ‘Hell’ ergo,
not profane.
The word ‘Damn’ is in the BIBLE as well as the word ‘Hell’ ergo,
not profane.
You were not quoting form the bible that makes you shallow and dumb.
Manny quit being a ‘Jack Ass’ {also Biblical} and produce Crawford’s m/v accident
report showing that he was driving while under the influence or shut your ‘pie hole’.
I will never shut my pie hole - You want me to because I SPEAK THE TRUTH - TIM CRAWFORD IS A DRUNK DRIVER AND A LOSER - NO ONE SHOULD VOTE FOR THIS RED NECK
I will never shut my pie hole - You want me to because I SPEAK THE TRUTH - TIM CRAWFORD IS A DRUNK DRIVER AND A LOSER - NO ONE SHOULD VOTE FOR THIS RED NECK
You know what Manny, I’m going to vote for Crawford, just to cancel your vote out for whoever you vote for, so just know, your vote won’t count at in the next election for Sheriff.
I will never shut my pie hole - You want me to because I SPEAK THE TRUTH - TIM CRAWFORD IS A DRUNK DRIVER AND A LOSER - NO ONE SHOULD VOTE FOR THIS RED NECK
You know what Manny, I’m going to vote for Crawford, just to cancel your vote out for whoever you vote for, so just know, your vote won’t count at in the next election for Sheriff.
Viper, you don’t need to worry about canceling out Manny’s vote. Manny is not old
enough to vote yet.
Now Manny, go to room for time out. And there will be no dessert for you tonight.
Good for you Viper, but I think I’m going to have to go with Dave Williams
this time around.
After George “DUBYA” Bush, I don’t think I could ever vote for another
Republican.
While I can sort of agree with you, in my personal opinion, republican and democrat are just BS titles.
Most people who claim to be Republicans these days are usually either straight liberals with some conservative views, NeoCons, or just throw that label on so their constituents will vote for them.
So that’s why I get extremely irked at straight party line voters, especially the majority who will just vote because of the little D or R next to the name.
Wait and see if the debates between sheriffs that I believe Williams wants actually happen, and we’ll see how it’s looking then.
While I can sort of agree with you, in my personal opinion, republican and democrat are just BS titles.
Most people who claim to be Republicans these days are usually either straight liberals with some conservative views, NeoCons, or just throw that label on so their constituents will vote for them.
So that’s why I get extremely irked at straight party line voters, especially the majority who will just vote because of the little D or R next to the name.
i have for quite sometime been of the opinion that the two party system needs to die. of course, because of Duverger’s law, only two candidates should run in the general election. but let’s put technical details aside for a second: solid third party platforms are emerging and they are being shut out of the process. it needs to stop. start right here at the local level. i think an independent has announced candidacy for CC Commissioner. he’s going to have to be well-funded to win, but i hope he at least starts some interesting dialog and gets everyone thinking and talking.
and you bring up a good point about Republicans these days. i myself have not been affiliated with a party for more than 10 years now. but i vote GOP most of the time anyway. so i’m not sure what good i’m doing. only difference is that i can’t vote in the primary election. i dunno i am seriously thinking about registering as a Democrat in time for the 2010 primaries. i get the feeling local politics will be interesting in the run up to this election.
i see a lot of former Republicans calling themselves Libertarians these days.
While I can sort of agree with you, in my personal opinion, republican and democrat are just BS titles.
Most people who claim to be Republicans these days are usually either straight liberals with some conservative views, NeoCons, or just throw that label on so their constituents will vote for them.
So that’s why I get extremely irked at straight party line voters, especially the majority who will just vote because of the little D or R next to the name.
i have for quite sometime been of the opinion that the two party system needs to die. of course, because of Duverger’s law, only two candidates should run in the general election. but let’s put technical details aside for a second: solid third party platforms are emerging and they are being shut out of the process. it needs to stop. start right here at the local level. i think an independent has announced candidacy for CC Commissioner. he’s going to have to be well-funded to win, but i hope he at least starts some interesting dialog and gets everyone thinking and talking.
and you bring up a good point about Republicans these days. i myself have not been affiliated with a party for more than 10 years now. but i vote GOP most of the time anyway. so i’m not sure what good i’m doing. only difference is that i can’t vote in the primary election. i dunno i am seriously thinking about registering as a Democrat in time for the 2010 primaries. i get the feeling local politics will be interesting in the run up to this election.
i see a lot of former Republicans calling themselves Libertarians these days.
Haha lets get a Libertarian in office, that would be very interesting.
My overall personal view is that, I just want something that I think most people want, a politician who is there in support of their constituents, I could give a rats ass what party they belong to.
Haha lets get a Libertarian in office, that would be very interesting.
My overall personal view is that, I just want something that I think most people want, a politician who is there in support of their constituents, I could give a rats ass what party they belong to.
in my experience, most Libertarians of the past few years are just afraid to call themselves Republicans anymore because of the damage Bush & Co. has done to the party. so they just migrate and latch on to the Republican-friendly tenets of the LP. so i’m not sure how interesting it would be, as opposed to a slight rewind/replay of policies and attitudes with which we are all too intimately familiar already.
i do believe in the Libertarian platform, but i don’t much support parties of convenience.
``a politician who is there in support of their constituents’‘
